IGN : TheBestNL,BetterBS Reason: run away after picking zhelms in Zakum without paying Details: Sold Zhelm for Cleric and SB for Assassin services, his Assassin died before Zakum ended and we didn't have ress for it, he picked helms with Cleric and dced out without paying
I feel this one might be a little below blacklist worthy. Was it agreed that the BS services were for ONE helm without reloot? Otherwise, it seems that part of the deal was fair? Depending on how late he DCed (and perhaps the reason for it), I can see it could have been frustrating to miss out on the SB he needed. So if an extra helm was looted, then perhaps it was somewhat out of frustration at the situation and viewed by him to "make up" for what happened? Not great, but I can see how somebody who is normally fair and reasonable could think that was a good idea at the time. How did you guys end up in a situation where you had 2 bishops and a bucc, and yet unable to res? Did he not have res on his bishop?
We had 1 bish in party which used ress in first run without this buyer Events of selling: Buyer came with 2 characters, lvl 5X Cleric and lvl 5X Assassin with enough hp to survive Buyer said that Cleric will take all helms (VIP for 60m) and Assassin will take S/B for 20m He died in last body and we didn't have ress in time for his dispawn He took all 3 helms of the ground with his Cleric He dispawned from map with lvl 5X Assassin He logged off with both characters without saying a word I think running away without paying is definitely need to award a black list P.S: edited my comment to say Cleric/Assassin instead of BS/NL, I guess thats on me
Ahhhhh now I get it! Yeah the 4th job names and the use of the word "services" confused me and made me think they were paying by contributing to the run rather than paying mesos. Blacklist worthy I agree!
Also had a bad experiene with Prees today. He was our leader first at apq but was really slow. We had someone who lead allot and we asked to hange Pt then he decided to ignore us. During the 2nd run he looted / stole a apple from one of the pt and he would not give the apple back saying ' you were on my platform' Be warned for this person !
As a long-time friend of JAMI I want to vouch for him. He's a really great player, but due to circumstances he cannot control his internet can mess up on him. I think this is an isolated occurrence, and others who have APQed with Jami can say the same.
Not to be a d1ck or anything but the 2 times I joined his parties he DC'd both those times. He always came back though to apologize. But he DCs ALOT.
I tried to get back into the game, but the client was not cooperating with me. I tried using mobile data instead of wifi to see if it was an internet connection issue, but still could not login or I would dc right away... Also re-downloaded the client from Wiz to Img files to see if it helped, It did, but for one day only. I'd have been happy to share apples with the party, instead, right away you put me on the Community blacklist without a second thought?? I don't take apq lightly, especially during the v-day event and I would not come back to apq empty-handed, I'd always offer reimbursement (onyx apples) to the party for dc issues. https://royals.ms/forum/threads/apple-farm.190908/
Requesting time for Reclient is interpreted as meaning that the internet is already unstable. It's nice not to rush into blacklisting people when you're not sure what's going on on the other side.
Ooh my first community blacklist post IGN: Haydeez, legollass Reason: Toxic CPQ Details: We traded wins in CPQ1, he refused to believe that I gave him the win 2nd round, double defamed me and ran (logged off so I'm not sure about spelling on legollas) P.S. also spammed the crap out of stun gg Spoiler We did a 2v2 trade win, I won first, disbanded second. He very blatantly got a win and has no idea what he's talking about since I disbanded 20 seconds out, but even if the game lagged and bugged so hard he didn't actually get a win that's no way to behave. Don't CPQ with this guy.
1. IGN: DIABL0R0J0 2. REASON: I am in an APQ and they steal my apple, I complain and they expel me for complaining The one who stole my apple is called DIABL0R0J0
For future reference, scroll up and screenshot the whole conversation next time. From this, it is not at all clear what happened. For all we know, the way you went about resolving the situation is why they kicked you out. Not saying that's the case, but it's up to you to show it is not by providing the full conversation
Added. Also, regarding the delay, I've had this happen as well. I once got in second place I think it was during a GM fitness event, but won third place because on the GM's screen, I came in third place. Lerp time, I think it's called if I'm not completely mistaken. Had this issue back in the day in other multiplayer games as well. I would kill players and they got annoyed because on their screen, I was nowhere in sight yet. Added as well. And added too.
1. IGN: ForceKiller 2. REASON: DC during APQ runs. 3. DETAILS: That player has been failing to complete APQ runs for a few weeks now, hurting a lot of APQ players. I don`t have Screenshot of him because I don`t PQ anymore with ForceKiller, got him on my blacklist for a long time already.
romancandle v. jackpot romancandle claims to have been selling an item for 6m jackpot was selling item for 8m jackpot told everyone romancandle was trolling, hence ruining his business romancandle got mad at cussed jackot out romancandle would like everyone to know that jackpot is a scammer i don't have a personal opinion on this but would like to ignite the drama.
You are just trying to stirr up the pot and start 1 big fight between people. In my persona; opinion this is Toxic behaviour and you should stop doing it.
1. IGN: xClaw 2. REASON: Apple looting in apq 3. DETAILS: His pet looted my apple in the last round of apq, refused to give it back. went offline even before I can even finish conversation
its funny cause you can lie about someone taking an apple and make them guilty for it. This looks like a no u no u situation need better evidence than just blaming one another. Its either you were not looking at your screen or he wasn't looking at his screen what conclusion is there to take from this??