Community Blacklist

If you don't leave pretty quickly, it counts as one of your two runs, regardless of whether or not pap was summoned. It is understandable that people don't realize they can quickly leave though. In the official servers, and on royals a few years back, it WOULD count, even if you left immediately. Many people don't realize that it was changed.

 

Easy, just put marking everytime, for those who fail to do so, we make a vote who shall leave? No one knows how the exact second that they provide us without deduct the chances, so lets vote the one who dint put marking to get out or the one who late enter to leave, after the vote who fail to do so can be posted here to join the list of HONOR

 

I believe there’s a 2-3 minute grace period upon entering

 

Nope it was like between 15-30second as i know, coz got once is plus minus 1min it did deduct, so we dont assume how long, just set a rules who gonna leave the map if dint put marking, and if marking gone= dint put marking too coz it is a 3min time for the marking to disappear so its more than enough to summon, this to prevent people argue for saying they did put marking just slow to summon as excuse

 

nothing to see here

 

Yeah, that sounds about right.

I really don't understand people who muck around before summoning krex or pap. I always want to summon it straight away, because there's also the risk of a toxic player coming in because they saw the marking. Best prevention = summon immediately once all your characters in. If needed, you can still sort out your auto pot, etc, once summoned. Pap won't do magic damage until you break the orb, and krex has massive safe area.

It would be good if people knew that they could leave straight away for it to not count. If pap has not yet been summoned, then it is still easier for the person entering second to leave. Most would if they knew it would not count as one of their runs. I wonder if a blue notice upon entry could convey how it works.

Even better would be if it worked the same as the newer bosses, where you have to be in a party (or expedition for krex), and the whole party goes in together. I wonder if this would be difficult to change?

 

How long ago did this happen? Did you send buddy list requests to both characters?

I think it would be better to wait until the person has been back online (within reason), and to have evidence that they ignored your attempts to contact them in game.

It is very possible that a sudden power or internet outage or other emergency struck them.

 

happened like 2 hours before i made the post, he just came back and refunded me.

editing original post.

 

Glad you got it resolved!

Just a small hint, make sure that the server time is visible in screenshots of important transactions or those taken for evidence. You can type ~servertime to show it (or ideally have the little clock thing visible).

 

(full SS attached)
Reasons for posting:
LoroPiana (@LoroPiana ): i might put this guy on forum blacklist for looting 3 helms for free


This post is NOT to put @LoroPiana on the blacklist, but to show the info.



Background Information:
5 attackers Zak run
Leader: PateCabra
Members: Zenoooo, LoroPiana, ascencia, krispycloud, akaneee (party leader's bishop mule). (I couldn't find their forum ID.)
1st zak run, we got zak helm buyer, and a skill book buyer.
Helm buyer died, and bishop does not have Ress. Book buyer got his book.
As I said before the zak run, I would like to reloot if there is any. After helm buyer died, party leader told me to "go ahead reloot".

After leader's permission on my reloot, on 6th line, LoroPiana replied to chat about Ress skill: "ah".
On 9th line, LoroPiana: "tedious".
On 11th line, LoroPiana: "i did mine so i know" (about Ress)

At the same time I was relooting helm. As I was checking my 3rd helm, I noticed that book buyer said "i can buy zak", so I said "k", "u wanna buy helm?"
During these lines LoroPiana was chatting and didn't care about the zak helms.



(full SS attached)


After 2nd run, we got spare helms:


And then goes the threat from @LoroPiana



As I was an attacker, and a white EXP attacker, I don't think I should pay for zhelms. But LoroPiana thinks otherwise. Hence the post.

Note: This run was recruited on Alliance, and I have done zak with PateCabra (party leader) before. When he said "greedy NL", ofc this is joking. Then LoroPiana said: "how can a person be greedy like this". I thought she was joking just like my alliance member. After 2nd run, LoroPiana kept saying so like she was serious.

Full SS attached:







After 2nd run:

 

please do. I would like to know what drives u to assume a white exp attacker should pay for helms.

 

any?

Before we enter zak, i said i would like to reloot if there is spare helm, any one else want? That led to party leader tellling me to reloot after 1st run. You did not have a problem with that when u were chatting after the run inside zak chamber.

Party leader: Zenooo go ahead reloot. No one else says wants reloot too including u.

????? really? lecturing about life?

 

Well i wasted my time to read through all the ss as im one of the hakunamatata member too, just some regular common sense that suppose to know for regular zakum player and not knowing for non bossing player, think just completely misunderstanding that lead this kind of argument happen, just let it pass, no big deal in this case

 

Are you going to post your evidence? Or are you just going to pretend that you have evidence?

BTW I have never been on a zakum run where an attacker had to pay for helms after a buyer DC'ed. I also never really see people asking the whole party for permission. What has happened here is not at all unusual. In future, it'd be best to speak up earlier and clarify these things

 

You accused him here of "deleting evidence", and then failed to back it up. People absolutely are going to mention you when you threatened in game to blacklist somebody for something silly, and then instead of admitting you overreacted in game, you accused them of lying about you, and threatened to "expose" them if they did not delete their original post. It is clear you have nothing to "expose" about them, and rather, you are just being toxic.

I think many people here would agree that YOU should be going on this blacklist for toxicity. Nobody wants to party with people like you who cause stressful drama, and then continue to behave in an emotionally manipulative way. You are much more toxic than many of the people who do end up on this blacklist.

The definition of toxic:

 

Should just ignore everything about this cases, it happen daily if the pt miscommunication about the drops, dont need to anyhow blacklist anyone for this small cases, have fun in game

 

Blacklist has been updated. Shop scams are no longer on the list after a split poll. Also added a "To think about" section to hopefully reduce petty bickering reports. Probably won't help much, but one can dream right

 

I'd recommend changing the example reason in how to file a report. It's currently "bundle shop scam" which doesn't really fit anymore

 

Good point. I missed that earlier. Changed it

 

1. IGN: Heavisidee
2. REASON: Bundle shop scam
3. DETAILS:
Selling Elixir one per normal price while selling Power Elixir at an abnormal price, trying to mislead customers.
I was cheated by 240 m.