Maple Story 2

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by maggles, Mar 26, 2014.

  1. Blade
    Offline

    Blade Well-Known Member

    I'll never understand how is 3D games fun.
     
  2. Chaingate81
    Offline

    Chaingate81 Well-Known Member

    I get 3D games that r trying to be realistic as possible but 3D cartoonish is kinda a turnoff for me
     
    Katsuruka likes this.
  3. Catlaunch
    Offline

    Catlaunch Donator

    It gives more options in terms of gameplay and art style. Some people like it, others don't.
     
  4. Kenny1
    Offline

    Kenny1 Donator

    It looks fun but, its just Nexon milking MapleStory for more money.
     
    xFMJxDeman likes this.
  5. JackDaneils
    Offline

    JackDaneils Donator

    Looks like fun. I'll play it when it's available to private servers. Fuck Nexon and their greedy minds.
     
  6. Gags
    Offline

    Gags Donator

     
  7. Manny
    Offline

    Manny Donator

    Depending on how it goes, maybe there could be a MapleRoyals2.....
     
  8. LowTierPage
    Offline

    LowTierPage Well-Known Member

    I hope it looks like Everplanet!
     
  9. Catlaunch
    Offline

    Catlaunch Donator

  10. Mekansm
    Offline

    Mekansm Well-Known Member

    Stereotypical classes are a good thing for Maple. GMS has gone pretty crazy with unique classes and many of us prefer the classic archetype. Its pretty clear that development hasn't actually begun yet. We haven't even seen a landscape concept image yet.
     
  11. Swag
    Offline

    Swag Donator

    I partly disagree with this. I agree, because the stereotypical classes were set up and work well. But I partially disagree, because I think the concept Maple had with the unique classes was awesome, it's just that they, in most every respect imaginable, failed execute that concept. The characters (post pirate) were not unique, they were just based on previous characters. If they were truly unique and balanced classes, I think I'd like it a lot.

    Yeah, it's probably pretty difficult to make a truly unique class given what v.62 MS had already, and I would've settled for a similar skill here and there, but I think we can all agree here that Nexon's attempt was complete shit.

    Let's all hope Maple2's attempt isn't as pathetic.
     
  12. Catlaunch
    Offline

    Catlaunch Donator

    N-no thank you. There is nothing wrong with making creative and original classes for an MMORPG. I mean, just look at DFO; 9 characters (M/F Slayer, M/F Fighter, M/F Mage, M Priest, F Thief, F Knight) and over 40 classes, in which all of them have their own roles and play style. And, like you said, MapleStory nowadays clearly has a copy and paste strategy when it comes to new classes/skills. One to four attacks, double jumping, passive skill that buffs HP/MP/ATK, dashing, etc. Just sit there and spam the same stuff while tanking all sorts of attacks. The Maple team is just awful at using their imagination for classes. And even then, when you look at classic, it's not that fun or balanced. Some classes can't even attempt to boss, i.e Arch Mages. Then you have classes like Corsair that have to HP wash out of their asses before grinding/bossing.

    http://orangemushroom.wordpress.com/2012/02/14/maplestory-2-coming-soon/

    Been in development for quite some time.

    It probably will be. The MMO market is pathetic nowadays.
     
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2014
  13. Mekansm
    Offline

    Mekansm Well-Known Member

    I mean a lot of it is a matter of personal preference. For me, having 40 class options sounds miserable - they already had issues balancing the original 4 and then 5, let alone 40. Its harder for me to get attached to a game if you're supposed to be starting over with new chars all the time. And if you're just sticking to one, why does having the option of 40 make playing a single class any better? I guess if all the classes are available at start its okay but its pretty frustrating to have a new class released that makes the other obsolete.

    And just because someone had the idea for making 3d maple years ago doesn't mean it's been in development.
     
  14. LowTierPage
    Offline

    LowTierPage Well-Known Member



    Sorry guys.
     
    Jacek likes this.
  15. Gossamer
    Offline

    Gossamer Donator

    the sheep train at the end got me
     
  16. ZombieEater
    Offline

    ZombieEater Active Member

    This feels a lot more like Crazy Arcade (also by Nexon) than anything close to Maplestory. Which was a great game btw, but then it stopped being available to play in North America :(
     
  17. Laszlo
    Offline

    Laszlo Game Master.

    Maybe Maplestory 3 will be better... :D
     
    Dizzysean likes this.
  18. Deven
    Offline

    Deven Member

    No thank you :/ This looks worse than Beta Maple (which i'm not saying looked bad.) The beauty of maple is that it is a very simple game, with the complexity in the details and algorithms used.
     
  19. Gags
    Offline

    Gags Donator

    It's like a down version of Minecraft. The skills look bad. The Tiles look bad. The whole graphics look bad. It doesn't even look like Maple, I'd say they name it "Maplestory 2" only for marketing, not for anything other than that.
     
  20. exdarkz
    Offline

    exdarkz Well-Known Member

    Just me or does MapleStory 2 seem like its based of Mine Craft and Mario :p
     
    Gags likes this.

Share This Page