Howdy! It's kind of petty but the wild inconsistencies with scroll names and descriptions mildly annoy me. For example these are all 30% scrolls but they're all worded or capitalised differently: Scroll for Shield for STR 30% Dark scroll for Topwear for STR Dark Scroll for Topwear for LUK These too: Dark Scroll for Overall for STR 70% Dark Scroll for Overall Armor for LUK 70% All the earring scrolls say "earring" except DEF scrolls which say "earrings"... Topwear for LUK 60% has two different scrolls but one is a direct upgrade. Just remove the other! Shoes for DEX not even giving DEX, just call them Shoes for Avoid. Not even Return Scrolls are safe. Return Scroll - Nearest Town Return Scroll to Lith Harbour Return Scroll for Dead Mine Nautilus Return Scroll??? Anyhow, I wouldn't mind going through them in my spare time if it's possible to do something about it.
this stuff bothers me so much too... All the duplicate scrolls like topwear for luk 100% and topwear for luk 100% with a slightly different description...
All inconsistency should go https://royals.ms/forum/threads/typo-text-error-reporting-thread.121610/#post-691803. We can only fix these during a wz update (which means a patch).
Excuse to make massive text document received! Is the library still accurate or should I owl everything?
I think you mean, if the text shown on the library for scrolls matches their description in-game? I would say for the most part yeah... I'm sure we have tried to fix a lot of typo's and extra "/n"'s and stuff like that, but for the way that the scrolls are named, I don't think we have made many changes which wouldn't reflect the very out of date library.
Mhm, I'll just use the ingame names and descriptions then using owl! So far helmet and earrings are done. Face acc and eye acc don't need changes.
