ToS Too Strict

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by SanderBuraas, Feb 17, 2019.

  1. SanderBuraas
    Offline

    SanderBuraas Donator

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2016
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    65
    This server has a good system of law enforcement, including a forum section dedicated to ban appeals. But sometimes the punishment for first offenders is too harsh. Let me use a recent ban appeal as an example.


    [​IMG] [1]


    This person was banned for account sharing. There is no mention of how long the account was shared, but I'm guessing it was not a long time. The punishment for a first offense is a 30 day ban, which is reasonable. Account sharing is unfair for everyone else. However, in the Terms & Conditions, there is some additional information about account sharing:


    [​IMG] [2]


    If someone shares their account over a longer period of time, a permanent ban is warranted. I think everyone can agree with that. In the case of shnigglefraz, it was a mistake - and the first time. She provided context in her ban appeal, but the permanent ban stayed.

    MapleRoyals has a small playerbase, which is why I think the Terms of Service should be more forgiving for those who make mistakes.

     
    Noobaholic, Maoz, Crowley and 11 others like this.
  2. nosebleed
    Offline

    nosebleed Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2018
    Messages:
    1,086
    Likes Received:
    1,643
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    If you think that's bad try reading the ones where players are deemed guilty until proven innocent (such as that Crowley dude).
     
    Chee, Maoz, Crowley and 4 others like this.
  3. Evan
    Offline

    Evan Donator

    Joined:
    May 29, 2015
    Messages:
    2,361
    Likes Received:
    7,147
    Gender:
    Male
    Guild:
    Resignation
    It's not that sinister- sometimes people look/do very suspicious things and it's in the best interest of the server to ban before they can potentially cause damage/RWT/Etc. It's no ones goal to ban innocent people, and I think the take away here is that if you're innocent, any investigation should reflect that (as was the case with his).
     
  4. nosebleed
    Offline

    nosebleed Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2018
    Messages:
    1,086
    Likes Received:
    1,643
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    As applies in the real world too. A dude walking around a neighborhood at 2 AM wearing all black and a hoodie is suspicious, absolutely, but you can't just arrest him and tell him to "prove his innocence or else stay locked up and face the penalties". You must actually catch the individual breaking the law (or have credible proof such as video or surveillance footage/accusations under oath) in order to arrest/punish/prosecute. There's a reason we've adopted the innocent until proven guilty approach in modern day civilized societies--remember when somebody merely suspecting you of engaging in witchcraft got you killed?

    Please don't get me wrong though, I'm 110% in support of permanent bans for people who are proven to the breaking the rules, absofuckinglutely, and even for the 'smaller' stuff like 'minor vote abuse' or 'robotic play' fuck that shit keep em all out. I don't want any of those hackers/cheaters on the server and I'm sure a large portion of other players feel the same way...but I'm not okay with legitimate players unnecessarily getting caught up in the crossfire when there is a simple solution available in just banning proven rule breakers rather than suspected ones (but by all means do extensive research into the suspected ones, and if definitive proof is found then ban ban ban).

    Yeah, if you're innocent you only have to remain banned for 2 months, get told you were being dishonest, and put through a fucking interrogation about random (and often irrelevant) details because some person wrongfully thought you broke the rules...and get no compensation or apology from the staff member after the fact. No biggie!!! It wouldn't be far more fair to just not risk banning innocent people by actually banning based on supporting evidence rather than thoughts and suspicion, noooope

    tl;dr: I think that bans should be based on what we know rather than what we think. Use what we think to find definitive evidence to turn said suspicion into certainty.
     
  5. angella
    Offline

    angella Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2016
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    74
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    alabama
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    IronAngel
    Level:
    181
    Guild:
    Ironman
    I was also wondering about those banned for vote abuse. Instead of permanent ban is there some way to wipe the account of nx? I feel sorry for those who have multiple players in a household.
     
    Pwimo likes this.
  6. FireHeart
    Offline

    FireHeart Donator

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2016
    Messages:
    635
    Likes Received:
    1,120
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    I agree the rules here are very strict in general. Whether some are lightened or not, there could at least be more done to give new players a fair warning.

    One solution could be adding a mandatory T&C quiz in Maple Island. For example, when you talk to Shanks right before going to Lith Harbor. Can call it "Wake Up Call Quiz" or "MapleRoyals T&C quiz" lol. Or cooler but less effective, edit the Beginner Guide etc. item to be "Royals Guide" with a different color and put the rules and other important info in there.
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2019
    FrankHuang, Maoz, Pwimo and 4 others like this.
  7. Tect
    Offline

    Tect Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2017
    Messages:
    3,336
    Likes Received:
    5,617
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    DTect
    Level:
    200
    Guild:
    Manon
    no one uses it lol
     
    ginwolf, HarGao and FireHeart like this.
  8. FireHeart
    Offline

    FireHeart Donator

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2016
    Messages:
    635
    Likes Received:
    1,120
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    no one uses it.... UNTIL NOW! :8):



    maybe just do a T&C quiz or do nothing :^)
     
  9. Dave Deviluke
    Offline

    Dave Deviluke Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2017
    Messages:
    11,004
    Likes Received:
    10,570
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    MapleRoyals Discord
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    CygnusQueen
    Level:
    110
    Guild:
    WorldTour
    I don't think it's harsh, since she asked friend to train for her - which falls under 10.2, Two or more people taking turns in levelling up a charcter (ie:training)

    The T&C are not harsh in this scenario
     
  10. CWCW
    Offline

    CWCW Donator

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2016
    Messages:
    651
    Likes Received:
    745
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    Lahv
    What she said was PRESS A BUTTON while she get pasta how is that taking turns to level? I feel that it's way to harsh since its only 1min~ of so called "helping"
     
  11. Dave Deviluke
    Offline

    Dave Deviluke Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2017
    Messages:
    11,004
    Likes Received:
    10,570
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    MapleRoyals Discord
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    CygnusQueen
    Level:
    110
    Guild:
    WorldTour
    Then where do we draw the line of it being lenient till too harsh?

    What about 3 minutes? Or 5 minutes?

    And can't the friend get the pasta instead?
     
    Dudu, TrinityEcho, HarGao and 4 others like this.
  12. Shnang
    Offline

    Shnang Donator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,428
    Likes Received:
    5,953
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    Sena
    Level:
    200
    Guild:
    Home
    Honestly I don't think its not that people didn't read the T&C's, but they THINK they won't get caught.
     
    Dudu, violaceopes and KWJ like this.
  13. SanderBuraas
    Offline

    SanderBuraas Donator

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2016
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    65

    It's so easy for you to judge her after it happened. We are human, we don't always make the best decisions. The reason I wrote the post is to show how important context is. She didn't ask her friend to start playing on her account, it was a temporary situation. She also shows remorse in her ban appeal.

     
    Maoz likes this.
  14. Dave Deviluke
    Offline

    Dave Deviluke Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2017
    Messages:
    11,004
    Likes Received:
    10,570
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    MapleRoyals Discord
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    CygnusQueen
    Level:
    110
    Guild:
    WorldTour
    I not judging her, what I care is about
    - How it happened
    - Why it happened
    - How can we prevent such thing from happening again

    I'm guessing she allow it to happen cause she didn't expected to get perma-ban for asking friend to play for "awhile"
    So the issue is players not reading the T&Cs, and how should we address this issue
     
  15. angella
    Offline

    angella Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2016
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    74
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    alabama
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    IronAngel
    Level:
    181
    Guild:
    Ironman
    It is the whole perma ban I have a problem with. Hackers, fine, ban them to hell and back, but you got these other situations where I find permanent bans to be extreme. Maybe ban that single offending account but allow them to reroll on another one? It is punishment without breaking a foot off in their ass.
     
  16. Dave Deviluke
    Offline

    Dave Deviluke Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2017
    Messages:
    11,004
    Likes Received:
    10,570
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    MapleRoyals Discord
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    CygnusQueen
    Level:
    110
    Guild:
    WorldTour
    The situation of helping friend to train account is too extreme for perma-ban?

    Just clarifying the situation 1st
     
  17. angella
    Offline

    angella Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2016
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    74
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    alabama
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    IronAngel
    Level:
    181
    Guild:
    Ironman
    A permanent ban on anything short of hacking or repeatedly abusing the rules is extreme. I think more along the lines of account bans to be more appropriate. Don't ban the user. People screw up, they learn, and hopefully they get better.
     
    Sayoran and Maoz like this.
  18. Dave Deviluke
    Offline

    Dave Deviluke Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2017
    Messages:
    11,004
    Likes Received:
    10,570
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    MapleRoyals Discord
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    CygnusQueen
    Level:
    110
    Guild:
    WorldTour
    The admins are strict on account sharing cause it links to RWT

    Banning just the account will only stop the account buyer, and the account seller still earned money

    Allowing account sharing will open the gate of selling and buying accounts
     
    KWJ likes this.
  19. Venin
    Offline

    Venin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2017
    Messages:
    1,114
    Likes Received:
    2,681
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    That's the trade off.

    To play on this server u gotta suck it up to the rules and accept that there's little to nothing u can do about it. I personally think some of the rules are too strict but....we are minions playing this nostalgic game to have fun. Drawing the line between not bannable and bannable is not within our power. I highly doubt that even with a 99% petition to change the rules on account sharing will the admins or Matt be convinced by the slightest bit. The only possible rule modification is on scamming and that is in itself very reasonable as compared to acc sharing...tho it's taking forever to implement
     
    violaceopes likes this.
  20. eugenekhor
    Offline

    eugenekhor Donator

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2015
    Messages:
    610
    Likes Received:
    800
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    5.4163° N, 100.3328° E
    Country Flag:
    Guild:
    Myself
    I recall back then when you acc sharing its straightup 30 days ban. Idk why you gotta make it so complicated. Like vote abuse, it used to be straightup 14 days. Now its like minor offence or major. How do you even define minor offence?
     
    Pwimo likes this.

Share This Page