Basically as the title of the thread says I think that a minimum of 3 GM's should discuss a report in the report abuse section before they make the final decision on if something deems a ban or not. I've seen atleast one instance where a GM made the wrong decision and it had to be fixed. If we make it so that at least 3 GM's discuss the ban in private or wherever needed before making the verdict we could avoid situations like that occurring in the future.
It´s not about him only, it´s a suggestion for the server policy. But in my opinion this would be a big hassle.
I'm pretty sure abuse reports are already discusses between several GMs if it's important enough, or if the case itself isn't clear and needs investigating. However, in most cases reports are pretty obvious, and in those cases I don't think a discussion between several GMs is needed.
You can somewhat track how many people have taken consideration into a report by looking at "users who have read this thread". Admins however don't show up but if theres a GM or two on the list im willing to bet that admins have also looked into it.
Not always true Blaine. Some GMs have their privacy settings set to not show up on "Users who have read this thread", so that wouldn't show up. But yes, a lot of the time we do discuss cases together in private.
