Hi all, I have long wrestled with the idea of leech pricing vs level of mages. With help from the leech formula (credit: https://royals.ms/forum/threads/how...n-a-party-while-leeching.174081/#post-1017330) I came up with a simple spreadsheet. Relative exp vs level of mage: It covers from the usual mage level range of 120 to 160. Feel free to expand the table if you're familiar enough with excel. The row/column locks should all be correctly set. Level of leechers is customizable, but caters for only 2 leechers at the moment. If you understand the formula, you can add more or hard code the N value. Some things to note: At lvl 80, leeching from a lv130 is only 0.97 exp gained vs a lv120. At lvl 80, leeching from a lv140 is 0.96 vs lv130, and 0.93 vs lv120. So, if a lv120 sells at 80m, a lv140 should not need to sell below 0.93*80 = 74.4m. I am bringing this thread up because price difference the current market accepts for level difference is severely exaggerated and I think the higher level mages should not be shortchanged. To everyone who encounters this post: P.S. This warped perception of the significance of level difference should be fixed, and it will take a long time without everyone's help. Please help to spread this message. If there's anything wrong with the formulas, feel free to point it out.
idk how to use this calculator. i wanted to compare exp between a 150 skele leecher vs a 160 skele leecher if the leechers are both 108. so i changed the yellow cells to 108 and 108 and I glanced at the bottom tables to the right side of the green cells. i got "0.896" for lv.160 and "0.918..." for lv.150. subtract two numbers i get 0.022033 which is 2.2% difference exp which is 0.978 compared to 1.00. am i doing this right?
yes changing the yellow cells is correct. Then with the table, there's column and row. so you match 150 vs 160. that's the percentage exp you get.
