Community Blacklist

Take your own advice before giving others. Same guy who was protecting Roany for harassing Sharon. I’ll leave it at that. Anyways have a good day.

 

"I'll leave it at that" = "let me say everything I want and run away"?

 

I give you permission because I have absolutely nothing to hide. I wanted your opinion and I got it. We disagree and I move forward. Thank you for the transparency.

 

You mean the same guy who made an active effort to publicly as well as internally advocate for a fairer application of the server's rules, and also leniently assigned you five warning points out of good faith instead of banning you like you deserved for maliciously flaming other players over and over again? Yup, that was me. And since you seem to be so interested in transparency all of a sudden, let me share with the rest of the community what kind of person you truly are when you thought you were in a position to freely express yourself without consequences. It's a shame you never took this opportunity to actually learn from your mistakes.

Spoiler: when you play the blacklist game you either win or you die

https://i.filehostingsite/hW53d7p/lmfao.png

 

1. IGN: Dieguin
2. REASON: Leaving zakum after 1 run
3. DETAILS: Dieguin joined our zakum run and in the run people even discussed who drops first run eye and who drops 2nd eye,
After the first run he suddenly went cash shop and then left the pt.

After asking him if he comes back or blacklist he responds ' you never said 2 runs '

its normal boss etiquet to go 2 runs since people wont finds part for 1 run. even during the discussion of who drops eye first and 2nd he never tolf he was only going 1 run.

 

I confirm what he says. It's pretty normal to expect to do two runs. There was never talk of 1 run. I also sent him a message, but got no response back.

 

on the other hand you guys apparently never explicitly talked about 2 runs either, right? Additionally seems like his english is not that good so he probably did not understand that you were talking about 2 runs when discussing EOF order.
To be honest, if you as a leader do not confirm with every single member or R> for 2 runs explicitly, I do not think you have the right to demand 2 runs from a player leaving after first run. There is many people doing 2 runs but there is also lots of people just leaving after 1 run unless otherwise explicitly discussed within zak party.

 

Zak - 2 runs
Krex - 2 runs
APQ 4 - runs

All these are common practice and can be considered as the norm.

But if u have an emergency in the middle of course real life is more important and u can inform ur party that an emergency has occured but if u leave without explaination thats just bad ethics.

 

Zak/Krex is assumed 2 runs. Nobody leaves after one, and if someone does without good reason they're often blacklisted. See, like 100 similar posts before this one.

 

For someone who dc alot in apq (the client crashed rather to disconnect) here are tips that i found work for me.
1) relog before every run
2) dont go down on 4th stage, if youre a mage just use aoe to kill mob and let team mates loot it for you.
from dc 3 out of 4 runs, now i no longer dc except times where i forgot to follow this rule.
i dont think this problem is due to my internet because it only happen during apq

 

I feel that if u have a reasonable excuse then go ahead u can discuss it with the party if it takes too long to kill zakum...

as long as everyone in the party knows, its ok.. leaving the party saying leader didnt say 2 runs is not okay.

imagine people recruiting just 1 run without saying its 1 run only? Isit ok?

 

Yes, its ok

 

Lmao

 

I vaguely rmb ditching @MoriForest to eat dinner aft the 1st round of zak

 

1. IGN: Ashshade
2. REASON: Toxicity, Lying, Threatening, False Advertisement
3. DETAILS: I've been smegaing "B>21 bwg" for days. He dms me saying he has one. We agree on a price, and the deal is contingent on him buying a new glove. He buys a new glove the next day, and dms me saying he is ready to sell his old glove. I go to fm ready to buy it. I check his forum account for due diligence purposes and found that he is selling a 21 SCG in his post, instead of a bwg. I confront him, and tell him I wanted a bwg as my smega stated, not a scg. He then gets mad, because he bought another glove expecting me to buy the first glove. He then accuses of me changing my mind to not buy the old glove, because I found a cheaper glove elsewhere. This is not the case. After I demonstrated through whispers how I was in fact a serious buyer for a 21bwg, he stays mad and tells me that "people will know my story", and tells me not to dm him anymore of he will report (clearly seeking a way to get back at me for not buying his glove that he falsely advertised). I dmed him on previous days to ask him if he bought his new glove yet. I also went to forums to check if he was legit right before we traded, until I found out he had the wrong item. He is aware of this. These are aspects I explained to him that demonstrate I am a serious buyer. Despite explaining these points to him, he refuses to accept and criticizes my behavior as if I am in the wrong. When we were negotiating the price, I even referred him to a forum post that sells a 21 bwg for less than what he initially offered me; another reason why he should know I wanted a bwg, not a scg. If I didn't want to buy his item simply because I found a better deal, I would say it straight to his face. The last time I checked, retracting an offer isn't against TOS. This could EASILY have been a miscommunication on both of our parts, but he had chose the worst way to handle it. That is why I believe he deserves his name on the blacklist. Please see screenshots for conversation in detail.