This is a little different, so I'll list in order what happened to me I was being persistently SMOKED by him even before I left a comment on his FORUM ACOUNT. I was uncomfortable because he would do it for days. One time he smoked me as usual and I was watching him at the time. As soon as it happened I told him to stop with a character named etumimi. However, he did not return my pm so I commented directly to the forum. He then replied with a message of apology saying he didn't mean it, and I confirmed his reply and forgave him for his actions, but he remains on my own blacklist (which is not an in-game blacklist), because I want nothing to do with him. I don't know why his comment was deleted and he only has a picture of that reply, but as you can see from my very first post, his reply of apology exists and I remembered it because I confirmed it. He probably know my IGN at this time and I told him that I don’t want anything to do with him. I kept saying this happened in last August. As others have said, sometimes PMs are not returned for various reasons. I don't mean to be rude, but I have had experiences in the past that my pm’s getting ignored/ignoring someone’s pm. I’ve seen both shadowers fm, at that time im not 100% those 2 are the same person but I’d like to lower the chance that I might be playing with someone that I don’t want to get involved with. And as a result of my continued ignoring him, he sought me out and came to lower my FAME. I am outraged at the actions of someone who has gone out of his way to find me ingame just to lower my FAME. I have two clients on so I saw this happaned. I was so angry here that I sent him a pml to the second shadower and told him not to lower my FAME. (I apologize for the cussing in Japanese). He didn’t reply after that, and I was still angry, so I smegad about it. I used a word I shouldn't have used at the end of a sentence. I apologized again. I told him that I no longer want to be involved with the past. If he promises not to get involved in the future, I have nothing more to say. As the person who replied above concluded, the basic premise is that I was harassed by him for days (which I found offensive), he was not blacklisted because he lowered my FAME! As others have said I am at the center of these incidents for some reason. So when I’m recruiting for boss run I’d check if the ign is on my blacklist or the community blacklist. This is being done by asking other guild members to check with me. I also limit the number of people on my friendlist to prevent something like this from happening. I normally ignores any friend request because I’m taking every precaution possible. Please excuse my remarkably poor English
So if there was any possibility redo smoke screen, make it only visible to the players that affected by that skill?
Even if there is, I don't think this should be of any priority..... There's basically no upside for spending time doing this it's also kind of off topic as it's not so much a discussion on whether smoking is toxic or not (personally think the majority are indifferent to being smoked anyways)
It's fair if you feel she should reply to you, but we cannot force for such matters, especially if she still thinks you were harassing you - the misunderstanding should be clarified first (그녀가 당신에게 대답해야 한다고 생각한다면 공평하지만, 우리는 그러한 문제에 대해 강요할 수 없습니다. 특히 그녀가 여전히 당신을 괴롭힌다고 생각하는 경우 - 오해를 먼저 명확히 해야 합니다.)
Will be responding in Chinese as well since you seem to be misrepresenting my replies above Asking how veen11 would like to resolve the matter is not a bias, etumimi has made her stance clear (she does not wish to interact with him) From veen11 POV, he would like to get a reply when whispering players for megaphones such as boss party recruitment, that is a fair point (although I think it's hard to achieve) From etumimi POV, she does not wish to have any contact with veen11 due to previous interaction And here are the points I would like to emphasize - I am not saying veen11 should be blacklisted for the single defame - I am not saying etumimi must reply to veen11 - I am saying the initial misunderstanding should be resolved if veen11 hopes etumimi would reply, at least some chances of it If you believe I am still biased to any of them, you may point it out by quoting my words 問veen11想如何解決這件事並不是偏見,etumimi已經明確表態了(她不想跟他互動) 從veen11的POV來看,他希望在boss招募等(megaphone)能得到玩家的回复,這是一個合理的觀點(雖然很難難實現) 從 etumimi POV 來看,由於先前的互動,她不希望與 veen11 有任何聯係 這是我想強調的幾點 - 我並不是說 veen11 應該因為單單一個 defame 而被列入黑名單 - 我並不是說 etumimi 必須回覆 veen11 - 我是說如果 veen11 希望 etumimi 能夠回覆的話,最初的誤會應該得到解決,才可能有機會 如果您認為我仍然對他們中的任何一個人有偏見,您可以 quote 我 As "kawaii" means cute, I don't know where you are going with this 由於 “kawaii” 是 可愛的意思,我不懂這個在幹嘛 I am open to criticism if someone feels I am being biased in certain replies, but you would need to quote my words that were being biased
all good, i dont hate her. i forgave her long ago already while defaming her. (its rly not sarcasticing) thank you for reply using my native language.
I don't think this matter should have been handled publicly. I don't consider the actions of either party blacklist worthy ( at least in terms of the community ) Personal and Guild Blacklist are obviously enforceable in such matters but involving the community because you couldn't follow your own advice of 'ignoring' the player feels a bit hypocritical.
etumimi has already reached out to the player via forum profile previously https://royals.ms/forum/members/veen11.45728/#profile-post-27276 I am not sure if veen11 intended this way, but his reply seems to suggest that any further "ignore" would get the same response (defame) Community Blacklist or Report Abuse should be the last resort upon communication breakdown, which is what has happened here
Even a forum profile post is public to others and can cast a one sided story. PM's exist for this very reason. I don't think it's appropriate to assume what his intentions nor thoughts are. This is about what actions he's currently conducted NOT what he might conduct in the future. I strongly disagree with this point. The community blacklist and report feature should be used to punish players who have conducted themselves in a harmful way to the community NOT because two children bickered about some imaginary fame score.
But the issue stems from them not seeing (or ignoring) each other whispers This is why I asked for the resolution I am not saying we should blacklist him for his potential actions (or for his intentions) I asked for the resolution, as he wanted etumimi to reply Even if something does not violate the T&C, submissions can still be made for [Community Blacklist] or [Report Abuse] Just because something is submitted does not mean it should be accepted for sure Note: It's extremely dangerous if we are heading down the path of forbidding certain submissions cause we think it's too trivial, the involved players won't be able to voice out at all I do agree with your sentiments that Blacklist or Report should be reserved for those who conducted themselves in a harmful manner to the Community, but I can't agree with labeling them as "children" just because they disagreed with each other Both of them have voiced out their intentions clearly - veen11 wants a reply instead of getting ignored - etumimi does not wish to get defamed + smoke screen Calling them as "children" does not help the situation, we should focus on the resolution and not just block their voices from here because we think it's "trivial"
I have no problem with Etu not wishing to engage with Veen but making a blacklist post about the incident is counterproductive to that very concept. I feel like the issue was resolved(ended) after the defame/smegas but then escalated once more due to the blacklist post. If they are incapable of communicating their frustrations and complaints to one another than they should simply avoid one another for their foreseeable playtime. I'm not suggesting that we silence people's voices but I wish small disputes were promptly dealt with. It shouldn't take three pages to clear up this incident. Particularly when a large portion of the community views this submission as 'petty'.
首先說問veen11想如何解決其實方向就錯了,是etumini沒有想要解決,秉持著不接觸不談判不妥協,哪怕veen11想示好也沒用啊,問題真的是在這邊嗎 Dave您說的 『我並不是說 veen11 應該因為單單一個 defame 而被列入黑名單』 看似很公正但實質就是都站在etumini的角度上狠批veen11一番 如上面所說的,問題不在他們原先發生的經歷,而是事後的 OP廣播、被舉報者PM沒得到回覆後而去扣名聲。OP 『憤而私信他並要求得到回覆』 這不是挺雙標嗎,我能無視你你卻不能無視我 難道原PO是veen11的女朋友,要讀懂女孩的心思,她生氣要臆測她不是真的生氣,還要親親抱抱舉高高,說妳是我的小寶寶 LOL Dave您確實照顧到了女孩子的心情,但客觀來說不是很公正,且當您後續說 的時候就又真的超譯了,這番假設推論,是柯南看太多? 抱歉我也超譯了 如上所言及,您的話語都是繞著etumini的權益出發的,這是後來我想@您的最大原因,請您真正公正的討論,如果您無法,就請讓blacklist的版主來就好,謝謝。 啊 我還沒提etumini自己說到在寫信給veen11時有帶髒字,這個您也無視了對吧 確實確實
it's giving "have you tried talking to your harasser"... the only thing this possibly accomplishes is making the victim feel like their feelings aren't validated while attempting to push them into a confrontation that they have already expressed that they don't want/find uncomfortable. I fail to see how this is constructive in any way, especially being uttered by someone with a staff tag to their name.