Community Blacklist

Yes I saw this as well. I'm hoping for the same but I doubt it. The people messaging me in game have clarified he's a scammer and they never received their money. He's also logged off for over an hour now. In game = scammer but in the blacklist page he's not a scammer.

 

hope you submitted a report to GMs , should be a ban imo

 

How can one do so? I posted here and thought it can get him blacklisted at least but I'd like to get him and his other characters on the same device/IP banned.

 

You can make a report here: https://royals.ms/forum/forums/report-abuse.107/

However, you need uncropped screenshots, showing the agreement and show a timelapse of the seller not providing the service.

 

Jheez well, the only SS I took is of the payment that I posted here. It shows enough of the date but I guess you would need an uncropped version for legality reasons. I can't provide that unfortunately, the copied print screen is not in my clipboard anymore. All info is within the game during that time you can see he logs out and never logs in, I don't know how I can grab proof of that but it would be logged in the data?

Well I'm out 280m, and I'm only on the forums because he hasn't reached out yet. I'm guessing he responds to the lower amounts for a refund so he can stay off the radar but so far I haven't received anything and multiple ppl messaged the same happened to them. I can't do much else, thank you for your time, I hope he gets caught and banned because it's Mesos I spent personal time to get and nobody wants to be robbed of that.

 

For future reference, royals has an in-game screenshot button. You can see which button it is in the game settings. I think by default it's scroll lock, if im not mistaken.
It's easy to use and always takes a fullscreen picture.

If it doesn't work, use good old print screen or a program like gyazo or OBS or other similar programs. It's always better to take pics of your whole screen and crop your desktop out (if you play in windowed mode) rather than taking pics of half the royals screen or whatever. GMs do not accept such screenshots. Blacklist reports can be tough with cropped screenshots too. In this specific instance, I find it believable even if the pic is a bit cropped because that guy has been reported before.

 

ahhh I never realized there was an in game print screen option ... This will save me headaches in the future. I did use print screen but I edited to the payment window client which was my mistake. Now I know for the future, thank you!

Edit: Got the in game print screen to work, thanks again <3

 

No problem! Yeah it's quite handy

 

Just wanted to provide an update, after 4 hours of chasing him down, then another 3 offline, I saw him online and TPed to him to confront him. He gave me a refund only after I did so. I'm wondering if he's not given refunds out to people who don't chase him down....

Either way, buyer beware, pay 1 hour at a time, screen shot everything, and if they run, chase em down .

 

I like Geto but I'm sorry I know Fox since I started playing this game and she's absolutely amazing and would never do something like this unprompted. He probably did indeed do what he was accused of and therefore kicked from the guild.

 

Surely this is gonna be a civil discussion and not a he said she said mud slinging competition

 

Imagine having to post anonymously in the community blacklist thread.

Someone break out the investigator hat and start comparing the way this person types and highlights words to other posts. We must identify this culprit!

All I see is a person with grounds to kick another person from a guild and alliance.

Is this thread now: "Community Crying When Things Don't Go Your Way"

 

Y'all take this somewhere else! Dont get my favorite thread locked !

 

I think its fair to kick whoever you want from your guild but going on a campaign to publicly shame someone and convince others to kick somoene from other guilds (especially since feisty is a influential figure) without proper tribunal seems pretty close to harrassment

 

Endorsing someone as an infamous person yourself would only discredit him/her.

 

Can we please address the elephant in the room? Regardless of if the post was 'anonymous' or not is this not harassment? This feels oddly familiar to the time my guildie called out somebody for withholding splits and in turn HE got banned. The dude STILL withheld splits though? but he's good though because the other guy was ban evading? Forgive me if my comprehension skills are off but you can you really excuse this as "Interns and admins are still learning everyday."? This is clearly TOXIC behavior that somebody with AUTHORITY should NOT be conducting. Demanding somebody be expelled from somebody else's guild is a bit farfetched? I come and go, I'm not here for a long time I'm here for a good time but these past few months I've seen an abundance of gm abuse.

BTW when we, regular players, accuse somebody of something we need a power point presentation with timestamps to prove a point.... You don't need one?

 

No it's not. If both guilds are in the same alliance and one of the members in one of the guilds did something unaccaptable towards someone in the second guild it is totally fine to demand that. I did it too.

 

harass
verb
ha·rass hə-ˈras ˈher-əs
ˈha-rəs

harassed; harassing; harasses
Synonyms of harass
transitive verb

1a
: exhaust, fatigue
I have been harassed with the toil of verse—William Wordsworth

b(1)
: to annoy persistently
was harassing his younger brother

(2)
: to create an unpleasant or hostile situation for especially by uninvited and unwelcome verbal or physical conduct
was being harassed by her classmates
claims that the police were unfairly harassing him

2
: to worry and impede by repeated raids
harassed the enemy

According to Meriam's dictionary I think you may have the wrong idea of what harass means.

I saw a couple of messages in a private guild chat and private alliance chat demanding to have a member removed. I fail to see how this is impacting the community as a whole. Ironically, the person who was removed would be more accurately fitting the definition above based on the conversation I saw.