GMs being biased towards non-donators.

I have felt like being a GM's friend can be a privilege in some scenarios like warps. However, after having spend hundreds of pounds on Royals I can assure you that the GM's do not care a single bit.

 

In my life i've never seen anyone say "stop" when being verbally harrased,
1) they either laugh and pretend theyre not hurt by it, which usually is themost effective reaction. or 2) they fire back.

one thing you guys clearly didnt realise is, I was new to the game, and the first thing taht came into my head was I had to run all the way back to town ( or town scroll) trade him and run all the way back.... I didn't even know the FM button existed until recently.

Also the guy in my party insulted them, but I have no control on the words coming out of his mouth and that should be treated as a seperate case. They Fired at me for no reason. If anything should they fire back at the person who called them a monkey? Its so funny how you guys looking at this situation in a totally weird way. If you filtered just my messages and the two buyers, the guy in my party made no impact. And if you filtered out just my party members messages and the two buyers, you'll also see that the conversation makes complete sense. (sarcasm)

You also need to take into considerations such as, I never knew I could report. so OBVIOUSLY my reply was far different than to someone who knew reporting was an available option so they'd act even more differently in the situation I was udergoing AT the time.

Only after the situation I thought, damn that guy was pretty offensive let me see if I could report him... But y'know you guys spent so much time looking at my unfazed reaction in the heat of flying bullets, assuming I knew how to report, how to go to fm, etc etc. I was a complete noob.

But my arguement still stands, was what he said really appropriate no. Was it borderline racism? maybe. Racism doesnt have a clear line of definition. WAs it offensive? hell yes. could the GMs do something about it? Hell yes.

 

Also to reply to the guy who said IT WASNT INSTANTLY. Bruh, I meant its instant for the fact they didnt even reply (second one) didnt even bother asking questions. Yes it was a double post, But I was making sure that they spot the insults and not actually just flicking through.

Obviously there are more nondonators than donators. lets not go into statsitics please.

Yep and the main problem are people like you too. You cant deal with problems so you just leave them.

 

May i ask what you think that Depressant did to offend you?
If you honestly think that being called arrogant is offensive and it hurts you i highly doubt royals is fit for you.

Depressant is my character and i think its pretty clear from all the response in this thread that you are being overdramatic.

 

Thank you for seeing the situation much differently than the rest, big up. You're very smart Im not taking any sides either, Im just sticking up for myself thats being harrassed for free.

 

This thread is to talk about the thought that GMs are biased towards one group over the other, let's not continue to discuss a report abuse post that you may have felt you were wronged on.

 

GetSwifty was mainly the problem, hence my second post was a revised one, but that got rejected instantly.

 

Than why did you report me when i did nothing towards you?

 

Your thread title is suggesting GM bias towards donators and I'm showing you that's not the case.

Also I am Asian too and found those guys comments offensive. I gave you a suggestion for next time, make it known in game the other person is harassing you and ask them to stop. And if they continue harassing you, then the GM can do something about it.

 

This isn't the place to discuss personal issues with how a report was dealt, the point of the thread was to discuss if staff are biased towards nondonors, which we are not, I might like to add. If there are no more new points brought up about this, I will be locking the thread as the thread has heavily derailed.

 

I included the two people in the report, Idk I just did it because it was the two people I was talking to in the SS

Small sample size is obviously the way to go since I dont HAVE time to analyse every single post in this forum. If you looked at only harrasment and defaming ones, it can get really ridiculous. (first page) since hacking and botting are all obvious bannable offenses. I understand that defaming is almost as bad as scamming because fame costs 1m each. But I still don't see how verbal abuse on my end is any less than defaming, thats what really got me annoyed. Especially when the game gives you 28m~29m worth of NX every day & playing the game for an hour can get you 4~10m depending where you farm.

 

Locked because the thread is no longer about donators and GM bias but the OP's opinion on how his thread was dealt with.