Hey friends. My bishop is almost 140 and my dk almost 135 (for bosses), and yet I'm not sure these are the chars I want. I have opened the Bs for leeches and bosses, reached my goal, and I dont think the dk would be fun enough to play. So I have been thinking of opening a Shadower or a Buccaneer, yet im still not sure what should I take. Bucc has some good buffs (Time leap, SI) when Shadower has only Haste as a party buff (or am I wrong?). Bucc has more base hp, when I have to invest more money for my Shadower for washing. I have heard that buccaneers are weaker for bosses, people would prefer NL/SE for bosses and a party will contain only 1 bucc. What are the pros and cons for each char? Thanks in advance!
^Via another server. For a guy who's played both classes & personal experience I'd have to say both are really fun classes, you dont spam 1 button all day! Also Shadower's have a skill called "Meso guard" which halves all monsters damage so you don't have to go ham on the washing. In terms of training their both equally good 3rd job and up buccs being good at mobbing and shads @ bombing bosses early on. In terms of bossing itself yes an NL/BM would always be rather preferred depending on the party layout. As a bucc you'd wanna party with heros, dk's, marksmens & sairs these classes would appreciate your buff of Si since you boost their damage. Lastly a shad who can bomb good will always if not all the time outdamage a buccaneer, but a good buccaneer will outdamage a shadower who cant bomb well. (not biased)
