Keep in mind this probably won't be abe to fix since the economy NEVER will be balanced, but i really like this idea. Alot of people going to rage (SPECIALLY THE 10.00% INCLUYED ME), but maybe this itsn't gonna be a solution since price's going up more faster them i go to care my mom.
Running HT costs a lot of money, it's a gamble to try to get those real expensive books and HTP. Most of those people who already used to run, have to make mesos to these cost. But I'm not talking mainly about the people who already do it, but the ones who never did, These people in special might want to rush to get level/equips to do, and guess where they will find that?
welp..good question! Since they have plans to limit APQ, i have no idea how newbies can still earn money without a mage/bish.. Spoiler however, they progress fast AF!! washing and getting all dam "godly" equips in 3months or less!
Yeah I agree with @godys points. Tbh, all these suggestions will make me quit MR. A good number of players play like 2-3times/week. They'll rage quit over those implementations. Not that I don't agree that we need meso sink; just find a way that won't hurt casual players. The chair gach for example was a great idea. Do something similar. Also, can we cool down on bringing modifications to the server. Almost all the brought changes since new-source have been toxic. Spoiler Fuck I miss the old-source.
well, that's why i suggested higher tax rates, another way as you put it perfectly "mesos leaving the system".. i also left a note: "current fee made to fit GMS, not a server with higher drop/meso rate. ***the new fee should be changed until is fit to the need of this server" people seems to look at the prices and rate and ignore the overall point
Can't they introduce untradable very expensive messo only cosmetic items for people with excessive messos to sink it in? Possibly seasonal or w/e to keep it interesting.
that's small part of my last suggestion (monthly gachapon rotation.) that i was about to post here, but majority vote NO and i see no point in put more time on this issue
It's ineffective because people have different tastes. Rich Person A might buy, but Rich Person B might not. I also remember Matt saying the CS has limited items ID or something, so this might be a little problematic to add in.