As my last replied message via private messages, i requested you for enlightenment on your "belief" of be infringing the 2,3,4,5,7 of the appendix. Which I've yet to receive a response regarding that. And just got shoo back to this appeal by you saying i banned as a person blah blah blah and totally ignore my request ? "Remember this ordeal started as you took items from your friend's account and they reported it as being hacked", i find this funny that you're implementing i "hacked" my friend's account as I am the one assisting her character since day one for her financially mesos wise for her items and washing. Makes no sense bruh, just like my perma ban. And in several instances I already ask you to seek clarification from her with regards to her coming over my place to play etc, which for as many times you chose to ignore and just carry on with your "belief". I believe the appeal section are for maplers in royals to have a fair trial and judgement against their ban. But the way you're conducting the trial,handling the appeal and responding me in your "dictator" language literally make this section redundant.
this is your ban appeal where you have the chance to provide evidence of your innocence. We've provided the reason of your ban which started from your friend missing her items that you took from her account, which eventually uncovered that you've been account sharing together. If you want to seek clarification from her feel free to do so, however we are not obligated to do that for you.
"We've provided the reason of your ban which started from your friend missing her items that you took from her account, which eventually uncovered that you've been account sharing together" - This appeal was initially started by me seeking clarification on my ban, which was answered to me as an infringe of the rules and regulations under "account sharing" backdated in november 17 which have been halted since. After which i duly admitted to the one off offense and pleaded for a waiver or leniency on the 30days ban as a first time offender, and instead you told me i was permanently banned. "If you want to seek clarification from her feel free to do so, however we are not obligated to do that for you" - I have no clarification which i need to seek from her, but i do have clarifications to seek from you which you should be obligated to clarify. 1. Why am I permanently banned for a one off account sharing incident instead of the default 30days ban for 1st timer? What did i do to deserve this special treatment ? 2. As per your previous quote in inbox, you believe i infringed 2,3,4,5 and 7 of the severe infraction appendix. May i know what did i do again, to make you believe that way? Any evidence that make you believe that way? Or are you just assuming because you feel like it ? 3. On you keep trying to indicate or make it look like i took items from my friend, I really dont know what escalated you to make this baseless accusation. Or is it just your sherlock holmes alike assumption again? "this is your ban appeal where you have the chance to provide evidence of your innocence" - As per quoted above, I am guilty of minor infringe on "account sharing" but not to the extend of permanently banned. So i believe there is no evidence on my end to provide to prove my innocence, because I am guilty of minor infringe. Or if you insist me providing evidence, would you kindly enlighten not so bright "me" on what sort of "evidence" you're looking at. And lastly, Tim. I hope you dont get it the wrong that the way I am seeking clarifications is a form of challenge or attacking you. I am just appealing against my unjust sentence. And I hope you will really read it through and reply, not just reply for the sake of replying. Thank you.
1. your case is certainly not a 'one off' as you logged in on your friend's account at the following dates and times: 2017-12-11 03:44:21 2017-12-13 17:35:05 2017-12-18 01:34:58 2017-12-21 01:40:37 2017-12-25 01:17:52 2017-12-28 04:02:45 2017-12-31 21:57:38 2018-01-04 11:41:24 2018-01-06 22:53:33 2018-01-07 00:25:56 2018-01-13 00:39:34 2018-01-14 20:34:30 2018-01-30 04:28:11 2018-01-30 04:31:46 You can claim some of these are because your friend visited you at your place and logged in at your PC however some of these logins have less than 3 minutes between their last login at your friends' house which means you're either next door neighbors or you've been frequently logging in on their account by yourself. 2. in brief: 10.2 Two or more people taking turns in levelling up a character (ie: training); Your whisper logs indicate you are logging in with the intend to get them EXP 10.3 Logging onto someone else's character in order to leech your own; in reversal, you were logging in on their account to have them leeched 10.4 Removing items from or deleting someone else's character; they reported to be hacked as items were missing, the last logins before the original account owner indicate that you may have something to do with that as that login was on your computer. 10.5 see 10.2 10.7 Wasting staff time by lying about the account sharing; Since you made that statement you have admitted to account sharing, thus you have been wasting our time. 3. I do not make sherlock holmes alike assumptions. I check data and base my bans and replies on that, see 10.4 We deem you to be guilty of major account sharing, not minor. The sort of evidence im looking at is chat logs, login logs and statements you and your partner in this infringement have made. Your ban appeal has been denied.
You and your assumptions again. 1. We do stay near each other, and logging in using a PC and laptop wouldnt be too hard. 2. I do not see any visible chat indicating we do power lvl each other. 3.Wasting time? Look at the bloody ign of appeal. I admitted it after u indicated the abandoned ign, and refresh my memory after you show the chatlog. ( you remember what you ate for dinner 4mths ago?) 4.Baseless accusation, did ask u to clarify with her. No? Did you? 5. Closing this thread without proper investigation shows what kind of person you are, mr dictator. And no point denying you re just using your sherlock holmes assumptions with no proper investigations. If you have a minimal self respect for yourself, you should do some self reflections and just step down. Im not the first victim of your incompetency.
