Character Name: Tayuya/Penduium Last thing you did: scroll YWGS Why do you think you got banned?: being friends with stomp/charlie Ban message when attempting to log in: Perm banned What GM banned you (optional): n/a
You are banned for RWT activities. (And I think it pretty much proves it with your "hehe"...seems like you already know what you got banned for. )
Well, all we can do is present you the kind of evidence we got. In your case, you were reported by someone, so we did a little more digging into it and the report matches up. Do you know why you were banned for RWT? Specifically, what you have done that may have caused you to be banned? Because on our end, seems like you admitted to it by making a believable claim. And I'd like to reiterate; the evidence will not be shown simply because it was an anonymous report. We have all rights to not reveal the evidence to protect the identity of the reporter. And if you think we're banning you because "we are staff" like what some people choose to say it, then I beg to differ. Banning you doesn't do us any good simply because we will have to gather evidence + handle your appeal.
so you have to gather your own evidence right? you cant just rely on an anonmyous report, i would like to see the evidence the GMS have gathered, simple request.
Well, we could rely on an anonymous report, as long as it clearly showed you involving in RWT. Meaning we don't just ban when someone reported you saying "Oh he/she is RWT. Ban him/her!". But rather, that person provided us detailed information of your actions, and even with screenshots to prove it! I think this should be a very strong hint to you already.
Since it seems like you are more interested in seeing proof rather than bothering to answer the questions that have been asked to you by Kai, I will reiterate for you: Nowhere has it ever been stated that we would provide proof in ban appeals, and therefore we have no obligation to show or even explain our findings for this case, this is so we can protect the integrity of our anonymous reporting system and the privacy of the reporter. The evidence that was provided to us is very clear and has been investigated by multiple admins. We do not make a final decision solely based off an anonymous report, and instead ensure that the evidence has not been fabricated, and that the evidence matches or directly links to information found during our own investigation.
Answering questions always up more holes in the plot right? Once again I will reiterate for you: what evidence have YOU gathered that correlates to said "anonymous" report? surely if it is truly anonymous then you should have no problem providing your own logs right? we wouldn't know who/when it is, just the information on my side which you have crystal clearly found.
Whether or not what you reply with opens up more holes in the plot doesn't matter - at the very least it would show you are cooperating and taking your appeal seriously. As seen in many other reports, if evidence can be provided without jeopardising the reporter's privacy then it would be provided, however in this case it cannot. Since you have decided to not cooperate there is no reason for this appeal to continue. The decision of your ban is final and further appeals will be ignored/closed.