Hi, I am a pretty casual player that hasn't logged on for a few months. I still vote every day though. I reinstalled the game today and it says that "this is an ID that has been deleted or blocked from connection." All Your Character Names: Allize I have two other characters but I cannot remember the names since I use them to store extra stuff.... one of them might be "Stellia" Last thing you did: Gachapon Why do you think you got banned?: No clue Ban message when attempting to log in: This is an ID that has been deleted or blocked from connection What GM banned you (optional): P.S. Is there any way to change my name for my forum account? I made my account without wearing glasses since I'm listening to music and typed 2 A's instead of 1.
I did not abuse the vote system. I only vote once a day. I vote from my phone so sometimes I vote at home and sometimes I vote at work. Is there an issue with this? What happened to be considered as major vote abuse?
I don't own this account and have never heard of it before. My neighbor also played Royals, maybe that is his forum account? So you are telling me that if neighbors want to play MapleRoyals, only one of us is allowed to play the game?
1. Allize 2. Stellia I have a third character but don't remember the name. It is a low level warrior character that I use when I run out of inventory space.
I am pretty sure you have more than these two, especially the higher-level one. please be honest with me
I am being honest with you, can you check yourself what characters are associated with my account to confirm? I understand that being neighbors causes this weird situation, but please check for yourself. Allize is my highest levest level character. Paladin in the 140's. You may be referring to my neighbor's account for higher level characters. I only know that my neighbor has a night lord, hero, and maybe a bishop. There might be another assasin as well.
very interesting that your neighbor uses the same connection and computer as you were using, and coincidently were voting at the same time. Anyway, the evidence against is sufficient to deny your appeal