Free Market Spot AFK/Camp/Hog/Selling Shenanigans

Discussion in 'Closed' started by Joez, Apr 23, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Kai
    Offline

    Kai Donator

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2015
    Messages:
    10,255
    Likes Received:
    11,297
    I cannot confirm this, the report I got was that there's a suspect shop botter. But BoredXZ (or maybe his friends) told me he obtained the spot after server check. This was probably part of my misjudgement, but nevertheless, it doesn't immediately make him not a suspect just because the server just went live.
     
  2. Dasha
    Offline

    Dasha Donator

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2018
    Messages:
    3,839
    Likes Received:
    1,656
    Gender:
    Female
    Guild:
    Degeneracy
    BoredXZ was the firs tot grab it as soon as a server reset, in fact, he had a perm shop opened right near it. I assume he wanted to share the spot with friends which is a common and normal thing to do.
     
    Economical likes this.
  3. Dave Deviluke
    Offline

    Dave Deviluke Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2017
    Messages:
    12,200
    Likes Received:
    11,952
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    MapleRoyals Discord
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    DaveDeviluke
    Level:
    70
    I think you don't get why I'm asking about FMers and potential botters

    Kai took action by going there to check cause he received reports about it
    Hence I said "So I guess your view towards the potential botters should be the Staff should not interfere"
    Then you replied with Strawman argument

    I don't understand why if you are against Staff doing afk checks, then why are you not agreeing with the part of "Staff should not interfere"


    And for the part of where I mentioned attacking Kai is because of "he DC'ed said person due to hogging"
    I believe you refer to this sentence by Kai "i've been actively getting rid of afkers who's hogging spot"

    Kai can only address both the potential FM botters+spot hoggers (for fun) as afkers cause what else can he address them as?
    He can't just lump all of them as 'potential botters'
    Kai can only assume the ones that did not respond as afkers, he cannot accuse them as FM botters cause there's no proof

    So I still have to ask the question, if Staff receive potential report of FM botters - do they ignore it
    What should the Staff do?
     
    NekoYen and Klorox like this.
  4. Joez
    Offline

    Joez Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2018
    Messages:
    612
    Likes Received:
    3,617
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    Latias
    Level:
    200
    Correct, he cannot accuse them as FM botters. The response should therefore not be "this guy deserves to be disconnected". It is as simple as that.

    Staff can investigate upon their discretion for any claim that they feel is believable. However, if the situation is nigh impossible to prove, I don't think staff should be placed a position where they feel obliged to do something (dc / ban / threaten / whatever else). I can just as easily say, "Dave Deviluke is hacking in _____ map" in the shoutbox and sure, a GM will be alerted to go and check on where you are but if there is no evidence that you are hacking at that point in time and if I don't have video/screenshot proof of such, they should not feel obliged to take some sort of action or attempt to elicit a response from you. You should be left alone, because there is no proof for said accusation.

    I thought my reasoning is reasonably clear. Feel free to discuss if you think otherwise.
     
    weiwei0310, MoriForest and Axium like this.
  5. Dasha
    Offline

    Dasha Donator

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2018
    Messages:
    3,839
    Likes Received:
    1,656
    Gender:
    Female
    Guild:
    Degeneracy
    Just my 2cents about this debate.

    In the name of the holly cheeseburger. Stop trying to make Shop hogging a happen. Its never going to happen.

    "Hogging" Isn't a thing. Have you ever tried to reset a spot or simply give one to your friend while you have around 5-10 people on it? The simple solution is to wait until most of them give up. It can take a few minutes to a few hours, depending on the other player's dedication to getting your unopened spot or the FM your shop is placed. The way I see it, hogging is such a general term that can be misconstructed by the newer and impressionable players, so I would really love to never see it being used ever again especially by a gm. If you use your hands (or feet, I really don't judge) to get a spot, it's yours for the remaining of the amount of time of your permit or until you decide to drop it.

    I hope staff members are not just roaming around the FM, seeing what player didn't open their permit yet and disconnecting them (I am sure they have better things to do) because if that player is a bot there are better ways to deal with it, such as like Kai mentioned waiting for a response and then teleporting them to an empty FM to see if he has automatically opened a new spot. That's just how I have seen gms dealing with those types of situations when the other players report foul play.

    Now for a more important topic which I didn't see addressed enough. Fm shop botters&Automatic logins.

    As for shop botters, my only concern is that the staff really don't have the tools to detect this type of software or simply the experience with the permit mechanics and FM mentality in general, so they are forced to rely on their judgment- therefor it would be case by case 99% of the time, Unlike other serious offenses. So far the best way to catch shop botters is inaction is usually you dropping your shop while having screenshots of a player camping your spot for a long period of time and then getting it despite following the buddy method, or have a gm near you to teleport them to an empty FM to see if they open a shop, but most of us don't have that luxury of having a staff member open to verify your claims on the spot.

    I clearly remember a year back our reports have been dismissed due to the lack of ability to analyze the footage correctly, or the sheer understanding speed of normal human reaction when a shop drops. Those same players still play while clearly breaking the server rules. But there is nothing much you can do without valid evidence which is hard to supply if the software is undetectable or hasn't been familiarized by staff members.

    Yesterday I finally saw a successful ban for a shop botter. I believe staff would get better and sharper with dealing with this type of robotic behavior and just improve from now on with the way they deal with FM botters.

    It's differently a step in the right direction and hopefully, this thread will get enough attention for the Staff to take this offense as seriously as macro botting, Glitch abuse and etc. Perhaps inspire them to finally be able to develop a way to trace this software. Just because its harder to detect or catch in action, doesn't mean it should be ignored.
     
  6. Axium
    Offline

    Axium Donator

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2018
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    31
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    reefkeef
    Level:
    150
    Yes I'm aware, and I appreciate you providing the screenshot. But that screenshot doesn't really change anything at all, "potentially" is not a justifiable reason to DC him. As explained on my prior posts and Joez's posts. Again this just follows the guilty until proven innocent premise.
     
  7. Kai
    Offline

    Kai Donator

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2015
    Messages:
    10,255
    Likes Received:
    11,297
    Correct.
     
  8. MoriForest
    Offline

    MoriForest Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2016
    Messages:
    1,574
    Likes Received:
    12,172
    Country Flag:
    My take on this FM shenanigan
    • Suspected botter trying to steal FM spot=calls for GM intervention if they are suspicious, d/c if no response
    • Spot hogger=your personal opinion doesn't matter here, go by T&C. They can hog that spot however long they want as long as they got it through legitimate mean.
     
    Sen, KWJ, Dasha and 2 others like this.
  9. boredxz
    Offline

    boredxz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2018
    Messages:
    459
    Likes Received:
    494
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    boredxz
    I actually did respond to him, but I was forced to open the shop up anyways.

    [​IMG]
     
    benkrong, JTee, pinkmachette and 8 others like this.
  10. Joez
    Offline

    Joez Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2018
    Messages:
    612
    Likes Received:
    3,617
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    Latias
    Level:
    200
    Sorry, but I can't agree with this premise in general and in particular not in this situation.


    Also, the screenshot in the above post deserves explanation. It directly contradicts what you said in your earlier post.
     
    weiwei0310, Axium and MoriForest like this.
  11. jamin
    Offline

    jamin Donator

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2015
    Messages:
    705
    Likes Received:
    799
    Please don't DC already-existing fm shops after 30s afk checks. Sometimes, you can be holding the spot for someone else or you can be waiting for people to simply go away (since permits open faster than hired merchants). There can be so many reasons for holding a spot, with or without the store publicly opened, that dcing someone for "hogging" or potentially botted leads to more harm than good.

    DCing (or warping a few inches away) potential afk botters under an already set up shop seems fine, though
     
    JTee, Joez, Dasha and 1 other person like this.
  12. Axium
    Offline

    Axium Donator

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2018
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    31
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    reefkeef
    Level:
    150
    Because afk checks are ridiculous and it forces players to be at their computer constantly staring at their screen in case of an afk check. Also please clarify this strawman argument I'm making, I'm not the one accusing anybody of attacking Kai, you are. Also putting me at a position where I seem to be at side with botters is a straw man argument. Telling Kai he is in the wrong and giving my piece of why it is, is not attacking.

    You're coming close to answering your own question, GMs shouldn't interfere without reliable proof.
     
    Joez likes this.
  13. Crakdaddy
    Offline

    Crakdaddy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2017
    Messages:
    151
    Likes Received:
    22
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Boston
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    Crak
    Level:
    172
    Guild:
    Armada
    I hate how some LAME mechanics are "just part of the game" but other LAME mechanics that dont benefit certain people get different views. IDC because I rarely set up a store but its just something to think about...
     
  14. MoriForest
    Offline

    MoriForest Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2016
    Messages:
    1,574
    Likes Received:
    12,172
    Country Flag:
    Lmao this puts a whole new perspective into this thread. Why is this poor guy threatened to open his store???? HE LITERALLY WHISPERED TO YOU HOLY SHIT.

    Let him set his store however he wants! He isn't afk if he's whispering you. Jesus fucking christ.
     
  15. Dave Deviluke
    Offline

    Dave Deviluke Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2017
    Messages:
    12,200
    Likes Received:
    11,952
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    MapleRoyals Discord
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    DaveDeviluke
    Level:
    70
    I can agree with the answer of "You should be left alone"

    But the FMers need to agree and accept that, supposed if someone hog/steal spot, the GMs unable to do anything cause they cannot disconnect without solid proof

    The only solid proof I can think of is taking video of the re-opening shop process
    (Note: this scenario is just high % of someone is botting, unless the player who wants the spot is manually spamming clicks every second)
     
  16. Axium
    Offline

    Axium Donator

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2018
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    31
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    reefkeef
    Level:
    150
    Well, that is not reasonable. Kai.
     
  17. Kai
    Offline

    Kai Donator

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2015
    Messages:
    10,255
    Likes Received:
    11,297
    Sure. BoredXZ provided a screenshot that is taken out of context, again. Before he took that screenshot, there was a 30s timer which I had set up. I took it down the moment I saw his respond. Hope that clears thing up.

    I understand where you're coming from. I felt the same. But like I said, we sometimes have to err on the side of caution. I'm not sure what else I can say.
     
  18. Joez
    Offline

    Joez Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2018
    Messages:
    612
    Likes Received:
    3,617
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    Latias
    Level:
    200
    That is how the current FM works to begin with. Just because you logged in after someone else and didn't manage to get a spot of your choice does not mean the person who got there before you is botting / hacking / using illegal means.

    Again, as I've pointed out already, spot 'hogging' and spot stealing are two different things. Spot hogging can be an end result of stealing a spot (which it wasn't in this case) but in itself is not against the TnCs.

    Spot stealing may be a breach of the TnCs if the person used an illegal third-party software to do so. This is the only situation that is difficult to prove and if players like xTaiga said have the luxury of readily available staff they can in theory check if people camping on afk stores are botters or not at the time of them deciding to reset their shop.
     
    weiwei0310 and MoriForest like this.
  19. Dave Deviluke
    Offline

    Dave Deviluke Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2017
    Messages:
    12,200
    Likes Received:
    11,952
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    MapleRoyals Discord
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    DaveDeviluke
    Level:
    70
    Okay, let's agree that afk checks are ridiculous and shouldn't enforced

    I will also not assume you are not at the side with the botters

    Could you give some examples of how players can prove the botting?
    What would be considered reliable proof?
     
  20. Doo
    Offline

    Doo Donator

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2015
    Messages:
    1,371
    Likes Received:
    9,278
    Country Flag:
    Guild:
    #Create
    I will be scared to play this game anymore if I met this situation.

    Next time if I hold fm spot for friends, or Want to wait other campers leave or they will steal mine spot , I need to reply gm if got ppl report me for 0 proof , even though I afking?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page