look at it again, drks are a little above heros with much more range, remeber that with the same amount of fundings a hero and pally have more range than a drk, the dk at the test is waaaay better equpide that the pally or the hero on the videos...
Dark Knight will naturally have more range due to weapon multiplier. You're right that DK has the most expensive weapon out of the warriors but that doesn't change its damage potential (on paper at least). Funding is another thing to consider but I don't think that is the aim of this thread.
Inb4 release of timeless weapon and DK are still stuck with sky ski. Step 1 to changing DK into a mule
Ure totally shure about this? Remeber that the endgame weapon of heros has 7/12 more att, that the ski, and pallys have 21 more att withouth counting the shield wich can have up to 21 att more, (the other equips all warriors use the same) on equal fundings in terms of dmg no one is waay above the others, but in terms on range drks are usually under the other 2
Haha, yeah. I dont think it would be a good idea release timeless or reverse weapons yet, but if they dont change speed of timeless/reverse spear, were staying on skis...
Important note: 2H swords like ST and Claymore have higher base attack than Sky Ski (6 att and 10 att difference respectively). However, spears have a higher multiplier, which means at almost all funding levels a Sky Ski will have a higher range. Copied from : https://royals.ms/forum/threads/hero-vs-dark-knight-dps-calculations.116318/
Those ranges dont look high gelted. 14k warrior range can be achieved clean with mw20 especially at 200.
