Why I'm with upset with how this game is ran/A little feedback.

^ Can you please tell me where?
Where I told him to say sorry for me being harassed, tell me where he had to say sorry for for disconnecting first. I saw your quote of right after. But as I recall, I was upset and stated that I wanted someone to be apologetic for the entire situation. Apologetic that I was harassed and that nothing can't be done.
I never said "Apologize for it".
To feel sorry and to be sorry are not always the same.
I could say "I'm sorry that nothing could be done/what happened". But that does not mean I am saying sorry because what happened was my responsibility/fault. There are many different ways to use the English language and the words "sorry, empathetic and "sympathetic" can always all by misinterpreted and be seen me as me saying something that I did not mean.
So you're right on that, not that I did tell him to say sorry, but I should've used a different word choice. Thank you.

So this is one of the things that jumped out most to me. If it is, "only a game" as many people including Andres, our topic right now, said and I need to take it less seriously when it comes to harassment. Then why is it taken so serious in "scandals" like you continue to say, or when it comes to the things on your list like you say. If there is a blacklist, then there is a whitelist.
Which means there also people you prefer and I am pretty sure are biased on because most people are whether they acknowledge it or not. I am pretty sure that, Andres and John and most other people I argued with are on because they are all "well-known" or have a bunch of followers and stuff like that. A lot of times, whether you believe it or not, things were NOT answered for me and if you want I can quote them here, but instead of me getting answers I got insults and people who originally didn't even read in which John himself clearly told everyone to stay out of it if it isn't your issue. Here, fine, open game. But there, no. And I hope you can also see why I wouldn't want to hear anything from that person/to shut them down when the first thing they talk about is "how hard things that should be easy are for me".

And if, as you say, because someone disconnects or the situation is now "over" and I should learn to handle. Then shouldn't that be in the case of someone did something else wrong like mass defaming them? But I've seen forums and heard longtime plays say, that if I do that, I'll be banned. If I talk to them in a manner of "handling my own stuff" and it appears as too aggressive to them, I will also be banned.

If everyone wants to nitpick every single thing I said, if even taken out of context or it being completely irrelevant to what I have to say, then I'll do it to.
You talk to me as if I don't understand. As if I'm ignorant or something; but you are the one who is ignorant of the English language, my friend. It is not possible for a fact to be based on your experience/opinion on someone. That's like me saying "I know for a fact that my brother, based on experience, that my brother handles situations in the best way possible." Sorry bud, but that is in no way,place or form a fact.


Next topic, just to be clear, "it's just a game." So it's just a game but these same GM's who say it's just a game banned numerous people who were COMPLETELY innocent to fix an economy..? A economy that turns to be *gasps* just a game? Wow. That seems completely open-minded to me. That seems to be so fair like you said.

Okay, you could have been like, Dimitri, who stated that me feeling like this wasn't the intention. Or like other people who say "Well, we can't help everyone", but instead you come to me as if I:
1) Overreact.
If I am overreacting, then why are people getting so upset and so riled up. If someone really is ignorant or "childish", instead of attacking them, especially when they are contributing to not just donations but also themselves and two other people who play, someone who always continues to play and is an active player and also convinces people to stay when they say the game is bad. I have personally told more than 20 people to stay when they said they're leaving due to GM's, the d/c, the lag, etc. I tell them about the new source that everyone's been talking about. I tell them about how "nice and concerning" the GM's are which I only see now is only a select few. I tell them about how great this server is. Am I saying it to make you guys clap for me? No. Many other people probably do it to. But does a person like that really deserve to be ganged up on which I clearly said I am because look at all the likes on everyone else's post and listen when I talk about the incidents on the game.
2) As if I'm a person who mudslings which particularly bugs/pisses me off.
In no way/shape/or form do I think it's okay, but when I talk about how "great" the server is and in this particular sentence, I'm being sarcastic, that is not mudslining. I did NOT attack these people specifically. I did NOT attack these people or try to shame them for something irrelevant. And I was definitely not trying to damage anyone's reputation by making "unjust" claims.
They called me a child, ignorant and many other things which were unjust because in the end, you people do not know me. You are making assumptions usually on NO basis and giving NO response and NO thought except you feel I'm being rude. Please tell me how/where. No one has even though I asked before.
YOU guys are the one ruining my reputation by degrading me sound like I'm some rude, ignorant, a-hole of a child who complains over nothing.
It is not unjust for me to have a fear of being banned, which I clearly stated was the reason I even reported her, when I see people being banned left and right. I do not want to be banned from a game I put money and time into. That is not unreasonable.
And about you believing I'm "mudslinging" because of my comment. If the comment is directly related to this case, which it is (the reason I couldn't take more screenshots was d/c, and I think the server isn't great at the time BECAUSE I'm being attacked rather than getting information that HE did NOT give me until I sent a complaint to feedback), then it isn't mudslinging. Once again, learn to understand the human language more.

People will probably comment on what I have to say about your understanding of the human language, saying that is "mudslinging", believe what you will, but it's basically saying that if you don't fully understand what I'm saying or know how to sound adequately educated. Don't come at me as if you are so much smarter/wiser than me. That just doesn't work.

 

I apologize if my sentence was hard to read. I do. But to me, this is proof that there is an exception to every rule. MapOwner, in my opinion, is supposed to back up people when a boss or mob or map is there's. It's not supposed to be used the other way around, so when MapOwner makes a mistake, in my opinion, because a computer can't justify who's boss it really is, it should be excused.

 

Oh?
I thought "GM's" and "Forum Manger's" were considered administrators of the game/forum. Sorry if I misunderstood.
And I never stated that you were the person I was calling out on in this post, it was clearly Andreas which I thought I stated.
Sorry, if not.

 

Correct. The whitelist is a community maintained list to inform others of those who have positive reviews in the services they provide. If you want to take the dictionary defintion of the word, then yes, it is a biased list, but for all the right reasons.

Others may not have answered your questions or given answers, but I definitely feel the staff have. Whether the answer was considered to be satisfactory to you is a completely different matter, but that doesn't mean they did not provide an answer.

Based on reading this, it's clear the intent of this thread has now become a back and forth between different parties, and not to provide any useful feedback to the betterment of the server and its community.

Thread closed.