Implement Lie Detector to Address Botting

Discussion in 'Closed' started by PhotonSphere, Jun 24, 2018.

  1. LichWiz
    Offline

    LichWiz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Messages:
    2,037
    Likes Received:
    4,412
    IGN:
    IronShichika
    Level:
    200
    Guild:
    Ironman
    Its pretty nice addition to battle all the boters and hackers that use insta logout.
    Not sure if it was mentioned above or not, but it can be quite annoying while bossing. Just imagine getting that on HT, pretty easy way to kill your run if you aren’t lucky.
    And if you suggest the manual one, it would be a serious trolling tool.
     
  2. Pwimo
    Offline

    Pwimo Donator

    Joined:
    May 5, 2018
    Messages:
    221
    Likes Received:
    201
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    Dikku
    Level:
    10
    Guild:
    dogstar
    Pretty sure it would not be implemented in raid bosses (zak/ht/toad/shaolin etc) .
     
  3. sparky95
    Offline

    sparky95 Donator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2016
    Messages:
    2,514
    Likes Received:
    5,687
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    Shakiras
    Level:
    200
    Guild:
    NewPlanet
    Only problem would be maps that contain strong area bosses like BF, Anego, Crow, Pianus. I think the problem can be solved if potting is still allowed while pinged for auto/manual lie detector or exclude those maps as they don't contain enough mobs for botting purpose (Maybe not crow...).

    I don't see how limited usage (only once on individual/day) of manual lie detector would make it a trolling tool.

    It can be sold in FM for 3~4m mesos and if the targeted person passes the detector, that person can be rewarded with ~2m mesos to compensate the inconvenience one had to go through if they were innocent.
     
    TrinityEcho, Zerato and LichWiz like this.
  4. LichWiz
    Offline

    LichWiz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Messages:
    2,037
    Likes Received:
    4,412
    IGN:
    IronShichika
    Level:
    200
    Guild:
    Ironman
    Outside of raid bosses, manual lie detector is just a mild inconvinence, if it wont be there, ill highly support the idea. Crow would be a bit annoying as it is a place where people bot, but yea other strong boss maps should be excluded.
    Also it will be a good idea to give someone immunity for 2 hours from the second they were proved innocent in the last lie detector. Which will avoid multi client harassment

    One thing i didnt get though, if i use the lie detector on an afk that was moving a min ago, would it still report him? Because that can be abused as well and i dont want to see it happening
     
  5. sparky95
    Offline

    sparky95 Donator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2016
    Messages:
    2,514
    Likes Received:
    5,687
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    Shakiras
    Level:
    200
    Guild:
    NewPlanet
    I think developers can set it in a way it would only trigger on a character that is currently "panting"? If a character is simply teleporting and travelling a long distance but not attacking, having a pop up screen would be really annoying.

    This panting motion should last about 2~3sec only after one has physically swung a weapon or after casting a damaging skill.
     
  6. Tect
    Offline

    Tect Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2017
    Messages:
    3,336
    Likes Received:
    5,617
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    DTect
    Level:
    200
    Guild:
    Manon
    it also happens when u get hit by a mob

    meaning if i decide to afk in a map n sit down, some guy sacks me n then does the botting thingy, i become a botter :(
     
  7. sparky95
    Offline

    sparky95 Donator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2016
    Messages:
    2,514
    Likes Received:
    5,687
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    Shakiras
    Level:
    200
    Guild:
    NewPlanet
    That is a problem indeed. Maybe there is a way for system to distinguish between attacking vs attacked :X?

    LF> more troubleshooting
     
  8. TrinityEcho
    Offline

    TrinityEcho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2017
    Messages:
    509
    Likes Received:
    1,554
    Gender:
    Male
    Country Flag:
    IGN:
    SnipeEcho
    Level:
    200
    Guild:
    Peach
    It should be possible to systematically detect someone actively attacking vs. receiving attacks while afk.
    On the issue of being sacked itself, I know this has been brought up many times. Suggestions like “lol just go to FM to afk xD” are always made. I myself hang on ropes/ladders, but I understand those that may want to sit on chairs for the a e s t h e t i c.
     
    Buccaneer and violaceopes like this.

Share This Page